An open letter to SBC President J.D. Greear


My sweet brother:

Welcome to the Big Leagues, by which of course I mean the politics of the nation’s largest protestant denomination. To be sure, this isn’t your first exposure to the ugly side of evangelicalism. You got a taste of it when the sitting president of the convention helped orchestrate the nomination of your predecessor, Memphis-area pastor Steve Gaines. Despite garnering a plurality of the votes on the first ballot in a three-way race — and a nail-biting second ballot that saw neither you nor Gaines win a majority — you withdrew in a show of unity that allowed Gaines to become convention president.

Flash forward two years and there was a fairly clear sense among SBC churches that you would be elected without challenge. Until, that is, the state executive in Louisiana decided to use the convention’s resources to underwrite the campaign of an opposition candidate. Did I mention to you that before he was a state executive he officed for 10 years down the hall from Augie Boto in the Nashville headquarters? Or that both men were trustees of the Executive Committee when they were hired?

Denominational jobs have a funny way of opening up like that for insiders, but I digress.

You found out along the way that not everyone who comes toward you with a big cheesy grin and a back-slapping word of affirmation is sincere. Some of those polyester prophets act like they are a friend — or feign neutrality in a denominational election cycle — but they end up giving nomination speeches against you. In fairness, though, you’ve probably learned they didn’t aim for duplicity in their ministries. They just get co-opted along the way.

In the past couple years, the denominational politburo has thrown everything at you they could. For the anti-Calvinists, they saw in you their favorite bogeyman. But you’re a former IMB missionary who served in the most populous Muslim nation in the world. I remember very clearly when we learned back at seminary that riots had broken out in your city, and that Muslim extremists were protesting outside your apartment and demanding that you be turned over by the local police. Those were some scary times.

And then, some of your detractors have taken issue with the worship style at Summit Church, or the community-wide Christmas program you host in Durham, or the fact that your congregation worships the last Sunday of the year in their homes with their families. Some criticize Summit’s multi-campus model (though you hardly pioneered it), or your preaching style. There are still some who probably don’t like that you wear sneakers on the platform, or don’t tuck in your shirt, or avoid pocket squares and silk stockings and other fussy sartorial embellishments.

But now you find yourself in the eye of the storm, and you’ve drawn the ire of some denominational bureaucrats and the pastors who aspire to become one. And why have they come for you?

Simple. You’ve exposed the rot in the soul of the Southern Baptist Convention. You’ve determined to stand with victims of abuse, to take the shaming that has too often been directed at them, to stand and take the blows and accusations and chastisements they’ve been taking alone. In this, you’ve made the tent of your presidency far outside the camp, and the powerbrokers don’t like it.

One week ago, I sat in the auditorium on the second floor of the SBC headquarters in Nashville listening to your speech. Danny Akin, the president of our alma mater, sat across the aisle from me. There was tension in the air, but also hopefulness that something was about to change.

The room was filled with the mostly old, mostly white, mostly male crowd that has comprised the Southern Baptist Convention’s power base for its entire history. They sat in their swivel board room chairs, leaning back, gently rocking with arms folded and hands resting on their chins while you did the unthinkable.

You called for accountability.

They didn’t like that very much did they?

And so, within hours of your address, they were gathering in little rooms all over the convention office to put the quash on your initiatives, weren’t they? They called you in and sat you down and tried to give you a lesson or two. Phones were ringing. Text messages were flying. Presiding over the meeting was a pastor who’s served on three different trustee boards, including chairman of one before he resigned for moral failure.

But Jesus predicted times like this would happen in ministry, didn’t he? “When they haul you before the synagogue, before rulers and authorities, do not worry about what you will say, for the Holy Spirit will teach you what you should say.”

There is now great pressure on you to back down. Doubtlessly, the machine is frustrated that you aren’t playing nice. That you aren’t singing from their song sheet. That you aren’t reading from the playbook they’ve been using for years.

You see, J.D., some Southern Baptist preachers (and a few denominational lawyers) evidence themselves the very hypocrisies they denounce from their pulpits. For more than a decade, they’ve been busy figuring out how the Southern Baptist Convention can give the appearance of concern for abuse survivors, but never really do anything about it. They say all the right words, but those words mean nothing.

As one public leader has said, “all talk, no action.” Or to borrow from the Epistle of James: “Do you see a bylaw workgroup that has a concern for victims?”

I think you get my point.

More than once in recent days I’ve talked to Southern Baptist pastors who see what’s happening in Nashville and at some churches in our convention and they say, “We have to be weary of wolves that come in sheep’s clothing.”

When I hear that, I can’t get the late Justice Scalia’s masterfully written dissent in Morrison v. Olson out of my mind: “This wolf comes as a wolf.”

Indeed, the wolves are coming for you, J.D., and they aren’t trying to mollify you anymore because they realize you’re not like all those shepherds who came before you. You’re not contenting yourself to enjoy the perquisites of convention office. You’re not offering the tired laments about declining baptisms, and you’re probably not fighting the “culture war” enough to satisfy them. Oh, and you’re probably not on FOX News enough either.

No, you’ve been listening to the cries of victims. Your ear has been tuned to the sound coming out of Ramah, mourning and great weeping for children who are no more. For too long those tears have been met with indifference, and in some instances, outright disdain. To our great shame, we have built our seminary chapels and installed our stained glass windows (some of which honor men who’ve concealed abuse for decades) and walked past the protesters outside our convention meeting with equal parts amusement and scorn.

I remember years ago at the annual meeting in St. Louis when the protesters left the outside curb, dressed like church messengers, and came into the convention hall during the address by then-president James Merritt. In the middle of his message, they stood up and began walking forward, shouting at Merritt until they were arrested at the front of the convention and dragged out of the room. One woman protestor was screaming all the way out.

I remember laughing, and my laughter haunts me. Sure, some protestors are merely seeking to be disruptive. Some use the platform of injustice to pursue their own unjust ends, harnessing public sympathy to get themselves a spotlight.

But that’s not what’s happening now, is it? You’ve met with the victims. You’ve heard their stories. They’re not looking for a spotlight, and most of them are scared to speak. Their wounds are still fresh, and probably always will be.

One night in late April 2018*, I received a call from Oklahoma. The pastor told me of an abuse victim who had been raped on the campus of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary by a fellow student. He read me her story — written in the form of a blog post the pastor was preparing to publish online.

After a long discussion, we both agreed that her story was too important to be subjected to the easy dismissal it would receive if published on one of our blogs. So we reached out to a few people, and within days I was on the phone with two reporters from the Washington Post. The rape victim — who did not want to be named — was willing to tell her story. And so she did, and the Post published it.

Very quickly the machine went into overdrive. Confidential student records were accessed, copied, and distributed in an effort to discredit her. Her name was released without her permission. She was dragged, painfully and publicly, like Hester Prynne, into the public square by religious leaders who thought they were doing God a favor. But all they were doing was further harming the weak to protect the strong.

God had other plans didn’t he?

Today, on the campus of Southwestern Seminary are walls of stained glass designed to honor the man at the center of her story. There are other men in those windows, some of whom have now been publicly named in nation-wide stories for their mishandling of abuse cases in their churches. Some have been accused of abuse themselves.

Here’s my point, J.D.  You are at a defining moment in your life. Probably even more defining than the days you spent in Indonesia while a Muslim mob torched cars and demanded your arrest. What you do now — what you say and how you respond — has the chance either to do justice and love mercy or it will reinforce a broken system that serves to perpetuate cycles of abuse.

If you choose one path, you will likely invite even more hostile criticisms, more accusations about your character and motives, and probably endless hours of meetings and phone calls with men who either attempt to seduce you or threaten you to tow the party line.

But if you choose the other, you may get yourself on a stained-glass window somewhere.

Insofar as you choose the former, I am with you in the storm.


*After publication of this open letter, I was contacted by the victim and told it was early May 2018 and not late April 2018 that she began speaking with reporters from the Washington Post. In the interest of absolute accuracy, I am footnoting the letter post-publication.

17 thoughts on “An open letter to SBC President J.D. Greear

  1. So incredibly proud of you my brother…this is excellent. A call to arms and a letter of support to wage a righteous war! @JDGreear we will be behind you – our army is great and God is most definitively on our side – the righteous protection of the sheep. The Good Shepherd is proud of the stand you began, and we cheer you towards completion. Praying, watching, hoping.

  2. I have been follower of your blog from many, many years. I have prayed that you would cut loose and really express your true feelings.

    Thanks for standing in the gap and expressing your convictions for yourself and others.

    Do your ever get idea that board (or is it bored) meetings are the same o same o?

    I believe June will be a historical event in the SBC. Will we finally do the right thing and take a stand for change for His sake? I pray that our Lord will receive honor and glory in the convention this year.


  3. Survivors like me, need bulwarks like you-never failing in your support, though the Heavens fall. Thank you. Beverly L. Robinson “My Name Is Alvonia”.

  4. May God continue to give you the courage you need and the protection you need to continue to walk in and speak God’s truth.

  5. Who all is exactly is coming after JD besides the EC? As you have pointed out on twitter, no one has come to the defense of the EC and the response online has been overwhelmingly positive besides a few individuals with a small following. Even some of the EC have stated support for JD online.

  6. Thank you for writing this. Grateful tears fall…as I continue to pray for J.D. and the abuse advocates/professionals assembled to make the sexual abuse training videos for the SBC. “Therefore put on the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you may be able to stand your ground, and after you have done everything, to stand.” Ephesians 6:13

  7. People demanded that the Executive Committee investigate these accusations of sexual abuse. The EC didn’t find the results they wanted, so now they’re accusing the EC of a cover-up. That’s a double bind. Sexual abuse is a genuine concern, but if it’s going to be driven by conspiracy theories and melodrama, I want no part of it. in case you’ve forgotten, the Bible also instructs to be quick to listen, slow to speak, and slow to anger (James 1:19). Many of the self-appointed zealots in the SBC have been slow to listen, quick to speak, and quick to anger.

    Many people will probably attack me for daring to challenge their “infinite wisdom”. Go ahead. I learned a long time ago that you can’t reason with conspiracy theorists.

    1. Ken…the EC is incompetent to perform this investigation. Always was. It’s why those who understand the crisis and have a rudimentary comprehension of Baptist polity and history suggest that an independent, third party investigation is required. The EC Bylaw Boys did a rush job. They were warned against this course of action, but they insisted. Why would they have rushed it out?

      No conspiracies. Just incompetence. The SBC deserves better. Victims of SBC ministers certainly do.

  8. JD is a man after God’s own heart. He will always stand firm in his beliefs because they are scripture based and Holy Spirit inspired. Thank you for your support of him. If anyone can begin change in the SBC, it is he!

  9. I attended JD “Hoggs” church for way too long…shallow teaching…lots of cliques and snobs…campus pastors who look overpaid…one of whom was caught smoking outside the church…Awana program stinks (mass chaos!)…one of the most unloving churches I have ever been to. There is so much money flowing into that church I wouldn’t be surprised to see a “James Macdonald”/Harvest Bible Chapel scandal happen there. Summit, at the top of the pyramid, appears to adhere to replacement theology and think God has divorced national Israel…I heard this straight from one of JDs sermons. Summit leans very left with the whole social justice warrior crap. Try to veneer over that Baptist Blogger!

  10. In your adoration of J.D. Greear, it was unnecessary for you to sarcastically criticize those who sincerely believe that losing classic worship hymns deprives the church of a proven method of instilling deep doctrinal content; those who honestly fear that the multi-site church model is leading to a “bishop” system; and those who feel that the pulpit of the Word of God should lead to the most reverent dress possible. There still a lot of people in SBC life who still believe these things. Many, if not all of them, have agreed with the content of your blogs about the difficulties we have been and are facing in our denominational life. They probably agree with the thrust of this blog. It was not necessary for you to express condescending disdain for them.

    “Pocket squares, silk stockings, and other fussy sartorial embellishments!” Was it really necessary to make fun of ministers who were taught to dress up? I was at the convention, and wore a suit. Glad to know what you thought of me.

    Interestingly enough, the president at that convention did not wear a tie when he preached, but definitely wore his best when welcoming the Vice-President of the United States. The pulpit of Christ does not call for respectful dress, but the presence of a political figure does.

    Of course, you had to throw in another gratuitous swipe at those at the convention last June who preferred Dr. Hemphill for president. These people are not an enemy, and again, many, if not most or all of them, have agreed with your analysis of the issues in the denomination.

    And your remark about “polyester prophets?” PLEASE! Nobody wears polyester anymore, even these people you dislike.

    You will not become anybody’s enemy because you tell them the truth. You will, however, offend and hurt some good people by becoming vicious.

    I’m sure that my post here will inspire another critical, deprecating response from you and others. Well, so be it. However, try to consider that people with different ideas who have heretofore gladly and enthusiastically received your posts may be people of integrity and good will.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s