SWBTS Reform: Part 4(b)


If Southwestern Seminary’s current trustees were required to give an account of the seminary’s health during the Patterson years (2003-2018) — apart from the horrific treatment of rape victims, the intentional nepiocracy in which senior administrative positions were awarded to both the immature and the inadequate, and the egregious suspension of faculty retirement and health benefits — it is likely that two categories of failure would stand out.

Mission creep and campus sprawl.

In this second part of our multi-part series, we will examine the problem of mission creep at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

In 1925, control of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary transferred from the Baptist General Convention of Texas to the Southern Baptist Convention. The two-year effort required amendments to the governing documents of the seminary and both conventions, as well as an amendment to the Texas constitution to allow for an out-of-state corporation (the SBC) to control a Texas-based corporation (SWBTS).

The new seminary charter stated clearly: “The purpose of said corporation is hereby declared to be mainly for the promotion of theological education, but to include the instruction of Women’s Training School for the special Christian service, and such other instruction as is needful to equip preachers and other Christian workers for their life work.” (See page 59, here)

At the seminary’s February trustee meeting that year, L.R. Scarborough was re-elected president of the seminary “for an indefinite period, subject, of course, to the usual conditions of good behavior and successful administration of this Convention’s trust.” (See page 61, here)

The new SWBTS trustees then reported to the convention:

“We are thus delighted to report to the Convention the successful consummation of this matter by which this Convention comes into possession and control of this great school of the prophets, with a strong, scholarly, evangelistic faculty of 40 fine teachers; a student body of around 600; a plant with buildings, lands, equipment and endowment easily worth two million dollars, with an indebtedness of only around $170,000.00. The institution is a splendid, efficient organization, a great student body, a wonderful morale and spirit, a large constituency, enthroned in the hearts of a great people, with a beautiful spirit of love and co-operation for all the other institutions in co-operation with this Convention and the conventions of the States of the south. We regard this institution as one of the greatest assets of Southern Baptists. We trust that this Convention will properly appreciate, evaluate, support, and co-operate with this great institution in helping to fulfill the purposes of its great founder and its many loyal supporters, who in its early years have sacrificed for its establishment. If properly supported this institution can be of great value in the promotion of the gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ.” (See Page 62, here)

That year, the seminary was organized into four schools: Theology, Religious Education, Gospel Music, and Missionary Training. The School of Theology was, according to the trustee report, “the great central organization and unit; and around this school the other schools are organized and administered.”  Its purpose was “to train in profound scholarship and practical efficiency the gospel ministry; and in the three other schools the purpose is to train partners and helpers of the ministry in all the varied activities of the work of the churches and the kingdom of God.” (Ibid.)

There was also an Extension program with a student body of 960 doing correspondence work. The enrollment in 1925 was 597, and there were 105 graduates from all departments the same year.

Southwestern’s first full report to the Southern Baptist Convention as its newly-chartered entity also included the following details about the practical work of the faculty and students during the preceding eleven months: 610 revival meetings; 15,783 sermons preached; 7,068 Sunday School classes taught; 23,110 visits; 9,012 professions of faith; 8,317 baptism; and 101,268 tracts distributed.

(In recent days, Southwestern Seminary has issued press releases about two professors who have shared the gospel with a beer-drinking Lyft driver and a copy repairman. Strangely, the article about the Lyft driver is post-dated Aug. 10, 2018 on the SWBTS website, three days after it appeared online.)

The capital needs at the Fort Worth campus were immense, on top of the operation costs and debt service payments that were required.  The seminary needed to grow the endowment, construct an administration building, gymnasium, and a building for the School of Religious Education. The trustees stated these needs clearly, and then did the unthinkable:

“We are willing to postpone a request for building funds and endowment for another year in order that our Southern Seminary may get sufficient funds for completion of its present demands in its building program.” (Page 63, here.)

The Fort Worth school’s share of the convention’s distribution was 4 1/2 percent, an amount that would provide “the barest sort of living.”  But the trustees only request: “that we be allowed to live, meet our running expenses, and pay interest on our indebtedness until our Southern Seminary can get its building program on towards successful completion.”

We rehearse the details for several reasons:

  • To demonstrate how SWBTS at its founding had 40 faculty members serving 600 students on campus and 900 students by correspondence.
  • To demonstrate how the original charter of SWBTS made clear the priority of theological education to train preachers through the School of Theology, but also allowed for the seminary to train other Christian workers.
  • To highlight that while the seminary originally had four schools (theology, music, religious education, missions), the three latter schools were organized and administered around the School of Theology.
  • To highlight the kingdom mentality of the seminary administration and trustees who did not want to do anything that would distract from Southern Seminary’s own building campaign despite critical needs in Fort Worth. (Already SWBTS had more students than Southern).
  • To highlight that the transfer of Southwestern Seminary from the BGCT to the SBC was done cooperatively, deferentially, and efficiently as the state and the national conventions worked together to amend their respective charters, facilitate legislative action, and finalize a ministry agreement.

Now for one indictment:

There is no credible or convincing way to exegete the seminary’s original charter — or any subsequently amended charter for that matter — to allow for Southwestern Seminary’s homemaking program. The Baptist Blogger raised these concerns years ago, to no avail. In fact, we were there when the trustees originally authorized this silly little idea.

A degree concentration was built around homemaking.  Professors of home economics were recruited and hired. An entire building on campus was dedicated to homemaking.

The rationale, you ask?  According to Paige Patterson: “If we do not do something to salvage the future of the home, both our denomination and our nation will be destroyed.”

And herein lies Patterson’s primary pedagogical fallacy. As a syllogism, it goes something like this: (1) The world is, well . . . the world; (2) the church is, well . . . a family of families; (3) the world does not like the church; so (4) the world attacks the family; (5) the church must be saved from these attacks; and since (5) the seminary is the place that models the church; (7) the seminary bears the burden of modeling the family; which means that (8) the seminary needs to have courses that help the family; and (9) among these courses must be a program of homemaking.

Or to put it more succinctly: If the world is against it, then the seminary must create a degree concentration to support it.

We’ll leave aside — for the moment — questions of whether the Pattersons’ views on the family, or their particular expression of family life, is worthy of replication throughout Southern Baptist churches. We’ll also leave aside the fact that the seminary has NEVER reported to the convention messengers (and likely not the trustees) the number of students who have successfully completed the program.

Nor will we address at the present time that a professor who occupies the Dorothy Patterson Chair of Women’s Studies is both unmarried and childless.

The resources that Southwestern Seminary spent to begin, underwrite, and prop-up this failed idea are inestimable, especially given the fact that no full accounting of the Pattersons’ spending has been made public during the entire duration of their stewardship of the school.

And it’s not just the homemaking program.  There’s the Master of Arts in Archaeology (to help identify and authenticate more Dead Sea Scrolls, no doubt), there’s all the Islamic Studies programs; redundant M.Div. degrees, and so many church music degrees it is hard to count.  In fact, just last week Southwestern announced yet another church music degree, a Bachelors in Music Composition.

The proliferation of degrees while the core M.Div. enrollment declined precipitously was a way for Patterson to keep his Potemkin Village going.  By announcing a new crop of degrees every season, it appeared that the seminary was growing. In reality, things were getting so bad that the seminary resorted to issuing press releases about “historic enrollment” this past Spring.

So what was this “historic enrollment” number?

Three hundred and forty three.

In Ken Hemphill’s last full year as president, SWBTS reported 927 new students.

The year Russell Dilday was fired, there were 1,045 new students.

When Robert Naylor retired, there were more than 1,300 new students.

Readers will get the point.  While the trustees were supporting every Patterson scheme to inflate the number of degrees the school offered — and multiply the number of schools and degree concentrations far afield from the seminary’s original charter — enrollment was plummeting.

But the seminary press office was touting “historic enrollment” to the very end.

Which is something like the coroner’s office passing out pink and blue candy cigars at the county courthouse.

If Southwestern Seminary is to thrive again, it will require a realignment of the school’s trajectory with the charter first presented to the Southern Baptist Convention in 1925.  The School of Theology must become again the central organizing force on campus. The ill-advised, separate School of Preaching must be structurally abolished and brought back into the School of Theology.  The School of Church Music needs to rethink the need for a concentration in jazz music, and Dean of the School of Missions and Evangelism should be demoted to “associate dean” under the supervision of the Dean of the School of Theology.

And that’s just a beginning.

Reforming Southwestern Seminary will take a full-throttled evaluation of every degree concentration and every program of study to determine proper priorities, funding requirements, effectiveness and outcomes. What is the purpose of a seminary degree in archaeology, for instance?  How many students are pursuing it? How many professors are required to offer the concentration competitively? What resources are required to promote and recruit for the program? And what are graduates with Southwestern’s archaeology degree doing 5 years after graduation? Ten years?

Simply put, Southwestern needs to do to its entire academic construct what Al Mohler led Southern to do more than 20 years ago: re-evaluate whether the schools and course offerings are consistent with the seminary’s primary mission, and shut them down if not.

These kinds of hard questions have not been asked at Southwestern in a very long time. The only justification for much that has happened over the last 15 years has been: “What do the Pattersons want?”

And whatever the Pattersons wanted, the Pattersons got. Right up to the very end.

It’s time for Southwestern to become a school of prophets again.

And not a cult of personality.

It’s unlikely the men and women who helped it become a cult of personality will be helpful in returning the seminary to its truly historic, and proper mission mandate.

Stay tuned . . .

9 thoughts on “SWBTS Reform: Part 4(b)

  1. Thank you for this update, as grievous as it is to read how far from the original founders’ good selfless intentions to serve God that Paige Patterson has taken SWBTS.
    We must pray fervently and there must be repentance of the poor stewardship of the SBC (and God’s) resources by those whose responsibility it was to safeguard them. Accountability is vital in trustees, as they stand before God in their responsibilities and failures to reign in the Pattersons delusional self-aggrandizing ways. It seems that there is a lack of understanding of this fact of accountability before God. Where is the fear of God in both Paige and Dorothy Patterson and those who allowed him to bring such shame and destruction to SWBTS?
    I agree that these hard questions must be answered by trustees and that remedial actions, as you suggest, must be instituted rapidly if SWBTS has any chance at all.
    Praying for Dr. Bingham and God’s humble faithful remnant at SWBTS as they seek His will and way in this dire situation. Praying also for God to turn hearts to repentance in those who have culpability and are still defiant before God in their hubris.
    Praying for innocent students, faculty, and staff whose hearts are truly desiring to serve the Lord in ministry sacrificially and selflessly. May God increase their zeal for His love and protect and guide them on true paths of righteousness for His name’s sake.

  2. I am a current student at SWBTS. I have never set foot in the Horner House and don’t plan to do so. How demeaning it is that SWBTS offers a Master’s Homemaking degree! These programs should be eliminated.Then there is the instructor in women’s studies teaching women how they should behave in marriage and child-rearing who is not married and has no children. This is the same professor who fully supported Shariyah Coulter’s posting of a student’s file and subsequent attacks on a rape victim. She should have been fired immediately. I took one class from her and will certainly never take another. Perhaps more students will realize she has nothing to offer the seminary and stop taking her classes. Finally, I get my news about SWBTS from you, Baptist Blogger, and really like the history of SWBTS that you presented in this post. Please keep writing!

  3. I’ve never been sure whether the creation of the preaching school was more a way to create a Dean-ship for someone who, in a previous role, hired PP or an exercise in hubris over their self-branded “text-driven” preaching. Either way, it makes no sense administratively.

    I don’t have any qualms over the Music Composition degree since it doesn’t create much additional overhead as, I assume, the concentration courses are probably already being taught as electives and teachers are already on-hand for private lessons. I wonder, however, if they offer a specific course in creating settings of scripture (settings from the on-premise fragments of Dead Sea Scrolls would be most suitable) where musical motifs are representative of the words, synthesizing a music school implementation of text-driven exegesis.

  4. All good words, especially about what is needed for recovery at Southwestern. I was one of over 1,200 new students who enrolled one year during Dr. Dilday’s tenure. There were only three schools then, Theology, Religious Education and Church Music. There should only be three now. The school of church music needed a major overhaul back then, and it really needs one now.

    I’d also suggest that the path to recovery might be made a bit easier if a way could be found to get the interest back of the Baptists in Texas who were completely alienated during these past years. There’s a source of potential students that might produce nearly as large a number of new students as the Dilday and Naylor presidencies did, since that’s more than likely where they got them from.

  5. Patterson appointed Dean Day of the School of Church Music continues the tradition of Pattersonian blunders in the once excellent school of music. They now have a chapel choir that claps on 2 and 4 every Tuesday Wednesday and Thursday in chapel, and a student (with no Master Degree) leading one of the major ensembles…and giving grades to Doctoral students? How about the once titan and internationally respected SWBTS Master Chorale losing,this year, the decades old Fort Worth Symphony contract that enabled SWBTS students to sing the great symphonic/choral works regularly in Bass Hall. Gone to another institution because of “declining enrollment and quality” at SWBTS. It is so sad.

    1. I was a student during Naylor/Dilday. Even then, I thought the music school was in another orbit. The emphasis should be placed on training Christian workers for church and missions, not producing world-class degree holders and performers. Many are not called into ministry but have come for the “subsidized” degree so they can get a teaching job; it’s a career move. . . . . . . Does anyone remember Dr. Hunt’s class in music and missions or Dr. Reynold’s church music classes? Time to replace world-class with church-centered and gospel-focused.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s